<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 705 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the impugned order under section 154. It clarified that specific adjudication on the tax deduction liability was unnecessary, focusing on the interpretation of section 154 and the scope of commission payments for tax deduction obligations. The Tribunal found that the payments in question were trade discounts, not payments for services by agents or brokers, and that there were two possible views on the tax deduction liability, rendering the demand under section 154 unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:05:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 705 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the impugned order under section 154. It clarified that specific adjudication on the tax deduction liability was unnecessary, focusing on the interpretation of section 154 and the scope of commission payments for tax deduction obligations. The Tribunal found that the payments in question were trade discounts, not payments for services by agents or brokers, and that there were two possible views on the tax deduction liability, rendering the demand under section 154 unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>