<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 562 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179172</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to allow depreciation on fixed assets, rejecting the department&#039;s claim of possible double deduction. Relying on relevant case law and the absence of contradictory judgments, the Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the allowance of depreciation for the assessment year 2007-08. The decision emphasized that allowing depreciation for computing income under Section 11 did not lead to double deduction, in line with previous judgments and specific case circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 562 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179172</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to allow depreciation on fixed assets, rejecting the department&#039;s claim of possible double deduction. Relying on relevant case law and the absence of contradictory judgments, the Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the allowance of depreciation for the assessment year 2007-08. The decision emphasized that allowing depreciation for computing income under Section 11 did not lead to double deduction, in line with previous judgments and specific case circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>