<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 659 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability on SIM cards sold to mobile subscribers, rejecting the appellant&#039;s appeal. Penalties imposed were set aside based on an interpretation issue. The Tribunal directed the adjustment of deposited amounts towards the tax liability and interest, with any excess to be refunded to the appellant. The decision was grounded in legal interpretation and precedents, ensuring appropriate relief for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 659 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability on SIM cards sold to mobile subscribers, rejecting the appellant&#039;s appeal. Penalties imposed were set aside based on an interpretation issue. The Tribunal directed the adjustment of deposited amounts towards the tax liability and interest, with any excess to be refunded to the appellant. The decision was grounded in legal interpretation and precedents, ensuring appropriate relief for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>