<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 658 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271953</link>
    <description>Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 permits refund only of unutilised CENVAT credit that has been validly availed. An assessee must be a registered Central Excise or Service Tax registrant to take such credit, and an unregistered assessee falls outside the scheme. On that basis, the appellant could not claim refund under Rule 5. The claim was treated as a refund claim, not a rebate claim, so the objection that rebate matters were outside the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction did not assist the appellant. The rejection of the refund claims was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 658 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271953</link>
      <description>Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 permits refund only of unutilised CENVAT credit that has been validly availed. An assessee must be a registered Central Excise or Service Tax registrant to take such credit, and an unregistered assessee falls outside the scheme. On that basis, the appellant could not claim refund under Rule 5. The claim was treated as a refund claim, not a rebate claim, so the objection that rebate matters were outside the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction did not assist the appellant. The rejection of the refund claims was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>