<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1094 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179152</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, emphasizing the application of the concept of mutuality in determining the taxability of receipts. It held that the amount towards the common amenities fund was not taxable but directed the AO to verify if the share premium and entrance fee were intended for common amenities before making a decision. The Tribunal noted a previous decision in favor of the assessee and disagreed with the AO&#039;s treatment of the amounts received as taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 21:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1094 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179152</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, emphasizing the application of the concept of mutuality in determining the taxability of receipts. It held that the amount towards the common amenities fund was not taxable but directed the AO to verify if the share premium and entrance fee were intended for common amenities before making a decision. The Tribunal noted a previous decision in favor of the assessee and disagreed with the AO&#039;s treatment of the amounts received as taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>