https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179138 Contemporaneous receipts, meeting notices and witness evidence established that the funds were received as society share money, not as the appellant's personal deposits, so the finding of misappropriation was upheld. Section 307 CrPC was held to apply only to jury trials, so the Sessions Judge could himself decide the charge triable with assessors while referring only the jury-triable charge. The appellant, as Secretary, was treated as an agent rather than a servant for section 409 IPC. Joinder of charges was valid because the offences arose from the same transaction, and no prejudice was shown under section 537 CrPC or in the section 342 examination. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:25:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179138 Contemporaneous receipts, meeting notices and witness evidence established that the funds were received as society share money, not as the appellant's personal deposits, so the finding of misappropriation was upheld. Section 307 CrPC was held to apply only to jury trials, so the Sessions Judge could himself decide the charge triable with assessors while referring only the jury-triable charge. The appellant, as Secretary, was treated as an agent rather than a servant for section 409 IPC. Joinder of charges was valid because the offences arose from the same transaction, and no prejudice was shown under section 537 CrPC or in the section 342 examination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Dec 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179138