<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 637 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271932</link>
    <description>The appeal for interest on delayed payment of interest was dismissed by the judge. The judge emphasized that the Tribunal lacks the authority to grant such interest in the absence of a specific provision in the law, citing a previous decision. The judge highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and concluded that the Tribunal cannot exceed its prescribed powers, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 637 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271932</link>
      <description>The appeal for interest on delayed payment of interest was dismissed by the judge. The judge emphasized that the Tribunal lacks the authority to grant such interest in the absence of a specific provision in the law, citing a previous decision. The judge highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and concluded that the Tribunal cannot exceed its prescribed powers, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>