<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Remands Case for Further Review on Service Tax Liability Due to Lack of Consignment Note Discussion.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27422</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation - assessee stopped payment of service tax in the pretext of seeking clarification from the Commissioner - Tribunal, without any discussion of these findings arrived at by the Commissioner, by a cryptic conclusion has held that in absence of any consignment note actually having been issued, no liability of service tax arises - matter remanded back - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 16:03:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 16:03:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Remands Case for Further Review on Service Tax Liability Due to Lack of Consignment Note Discussion.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27422</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation - assessee stopped payment of service tax in the pretext of seeking clarification from the Commissioner - Tribunal, without any discussion of these findings arrived at by the Commissioner, by a cryptic conclusion has held that in absence of any consignment note actually having been issued, no liability of service tax arises - matter remanded back - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 16:03:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>