<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 749 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179127</link>
    <description>The Central Information Commission (CIC) addressed a case involving an appellant seeking information on actions taken regarding the garlanding of Dr. Ambedkar&#039;s statue. The CIC directed the CPIO to provide the government order on record retention and relevant register, emphasizing compliance with RTI procedures. The CIC also highlighted challenges faced by RTI applicants in submitting applications and fees to CPIOs in the Defence Ministry, urging improvements in application processes. Additionally, the CIC noted that delegating order-making functions to CPIOs by the first Appellate Authority was impermissible, emphasizing the importance of independent order issuance. The appeal was disposed of with directives for proper handling of appeals and free provision of order copies to parties for transparency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 749 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179127</link>
      <description>The Central Information Commission (CIC) addressed a case involving an appellant seeking information on actions taken regarding the garlanding of Dr. Ambedkar&#039;s statue. The CIC directed the CPIO to provide the government order on record retention and relevant register, emphasizing compliance with RTI procedures. The CIC also highlighted challenges faced by RTI applicants in submitting applications and fees to CPIOs in the Defence Ministry, urging improvements in application processes. Additionally, the CIC noted that delegating order-making functions to CPIOs by the first Appellate Authority was impermissible, emphasizing the importance of independent order issuance. The appeal was disposed of with directives for proper handling of appeals and free provision of order copies to parties for transparency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>