<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1941 (4) TMI 12 - CHIEF COURT OF OUDH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179120</link>
    <description>The existence of material supporting an inference is a question of law, while the sufficiency of evidence is ordinarily one of fact. On the facts, the assessee gave no satisfactory explanation of the source, quantum, or investment of the capital said to have been advanced, and the circumstances justified a presumption that additional account books existed and were withheld. Circumstantial evidence and general probabilities were treated as adequate material, particularly where the relevant facts lay within the assessee&#039;s special knowledge. The finding that the Income-tax authorities had material on record was upheld, and no direction to state a case was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1941 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:50:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1941 (4) TMI 12 - CHIEF COURT OF OUDH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179120</link>
      <description>The existence of material supporting an inference is a question of law, while the sufficiency of evidence is ordinarily one of fact. On the facts, the assessee gave no satisfactory explanation of the source, quantum, or investment of the capital said to have been advanced, and the circumstances justified a presumption that additional account books existed and were withheld. Circumstantial evidence and general probabilities were treated as adequate material, particularly where the relevant facts lay within the assessee&#039;s special knowledge. The finding that the Income-tax authorities had material on record was upheld, and no direction to state a case was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1941 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>