<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 818 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179115</link>
    <description>Section 123 of the Customs Act applies only where seized goods are reasonably believed to be smuggled, so its burden-shifting effect depends on that factual foundation. A statement recorded under section 108 may be relied on in customs proceedings where it is treated as part of the statutory inquiry and is not retracted, and surrounding material may independently support a smuggling case. Section 135(1)(i) operates only when section 123 is attracted and the statutory value threshold is met; where that condition is absent, liability may still fall under section 135(1)(ii) if its ingredients are established. Section 135(3) is not available unless its special-reasons requirement is engaged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 818 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179115</link>
      <description>Section 123 of the Customs Act applies only where seized goods are reasonably believed to be smuggled, so its burden-shifting effect depends on that factual foundation. A statement recorded under section 108 may be relied on in customs proceedings where it is treated as part of the statutory inquiry and is not retracted, and surrounding material may independently support a smuggling case. Section 135(1)(i) operates only when section 123 is attracted and the statutory value threshold is met; where that condition is absent, liability may still fall under section 135(1)(ii) if its ingredients are established. Section 135(3) is not available unless its special-reasons requirement is engaged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>