<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 237 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179108</link>
    <description>The appeals challenged the disallowance of interest expenses claimed by two assessees for the assessment year 2007-08. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest expenses on grounds of interest-free advances given to certain parties. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, emphasizing the lack of business purposes for the advances. The Tribunal concurred, noting insufficient evidence of commercial expediency for the interest-free advances. Citing precedent, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance, emphasizing the purpose of the advances over the source of funds. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, affirming the disallowance of interest expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 237 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179108</link>
      <description>The appeals challenged the disallowance of interest expenses claimed by two assessees for the assessment year 2007-08. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest expenses on grounds of interest-free advances given to certain parties. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, emphasizing the lack of business purposes for the advances. The Tribunal concurred, noting insufficient evidence of commercial expediency for the interest-free advances. Citing precedent, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance, emphasizing the purpose of the advances over the source of funds. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, affirming the disallowance of interest expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>