https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179095 The remission application for duty payable on finished goods and Cenvat credit availed on inputs following a fire accident was rejected due to discrepancies in information provided, disagreement on estimated losses, and conflicting reports on the cause of the fire. The rejection was based on the assessment of negligence in the accident, with findings from various sources supporting the conclusion that necessary precautions were not taken, making the accident avoidable. The lack of alignment in the information presented and the presence of negligence led to the denial of the remission claim for inputs, capital goods, and civil works. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:28:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179095 The remission application for duty payable on finished goods and Cenvat credit availed on inputs following a fire accident was rejected due to discrepancies in information provided, disagreement on estimated losses, and conflicting reports on the cause of the fire. The rejection was based on the assessment of negligence in the accident, with findings from various sources supporting the conclusion that necessary precautions were not taken, making the accident avoidable. The lack of alignment in the information presented and the presence of negligence led to the denial of the remission claim for inputs, capital goods, and civil works. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179095