<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 606 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271901</link>
    <description>The High Court concluded that the issue regarding the admissibility of the depreciation claim on the revaluation of investments did not raise any substantial question of law as it was settled by precedent cases and the respondent&#039;s consistent accounting method. The Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and dismissed the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of the depreciation claim. The appeal will proceed for final hearing on the previously admitted questions (4, 5, and 7).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 606 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271901</link>
      <description>The High Court concluded that the issue regarding the admissibility of the depreciation claim on the revaluation of investments did not raise any substantial question of law as it was settled by precedent cases and the respondent&#039;s consistent accounting method. The Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and dismissed the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of the depreciation claim. The appeal will proceed for final hearing on the previously admitted questions (4, 5, and 7).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>