<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 597 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271892</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of providing the assessee with an adequate opportunity to be heard and ensuring that the appeal is decided on its merits. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order and remitted the issue back for a fresh hearing, highlighting the principles of natural justice and the necessity for a fair chance to present the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 597 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271892</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of providing the assessee with an adequate opportunity to be heard and ensuring that the appeal is decided on its merits. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order and remitted the issue back for a fresh hearing, highlighting the principles of natural justice and the necessity for a fair chance to present the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>