<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 595 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271890</link>
    <description>The High Court found the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order unsustainable and remanded the case for a fresh decision. The Respondent was held liable for service tax payment under a Goods Transport Agreement despite claiming to seek clarification from the tax authorities. The Court emphasized the necessity of a consignment note for service tax liability and criticized the Tribunal for inadequately reasoned orders. Ultimately, the Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the Tax Appeal and favoring the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 595 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271890</link>
      <description>The High Court found the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order unsustainable and remanded the case for a fresh decision. The Respondent was held liable for service tax payment under a Goods Transport Agreement despite claiming to seek clarification from the tax authorities. The Court emphasized the necessity of a consignment note for service tax liability and criticized the Tribunal for inadequately reasoned orders. Ultimately, the Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the Tax Appeal and favoring the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>