<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 68 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the rectification application filed by the appellants seeking to rectify an &#039;apparent mistake&#039; in a previous order where their delay condonation application was dismissed. The dismissal was based on the finding that a delay condonation application cannot be rectified under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 68 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the rectification application filed by the appellants seeking to rectify an &#039;apparent mistake&#039; in a previous order where their delay condonation application was dismissed. The dismissal was based on the finding that a delay condonation application cannot be rectified under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>