<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 993 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179089</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the society, setting aside the orders of the Assessing Officer, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that the society was entitled to exemption under Section 11(5) of the Income Tax Act as the investments were made due to inadvertence and misrepresentation by the investee companies, in line with a Delhi High Court judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:13:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 993 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179089</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the society, setting aside the orders of the Assessing Officer, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that the society was entitled to exemption under Section 11(5) of the Income Tax Act as the investments were made due to inadvertence and misrepresentation by the investee companies, in line with a Delhi High Court judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>