<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 545 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179088</link>
    <description>Appellate interference is unwarranted where appellants lead no evidence to substantiate their case and therefore fail to discharge the evidentiary burden on appeal. On that basis, the impugned order was not disturbed and the appeal was dismissed for want of evidence. The text emphasises that the absence of supporting proof is determinative when a party seeks to challenge an earlier decision in appellate proceedings, leaving no basis for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:59:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 545 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179088</link>
      <description>Appellate interference is unwarranted where appellants lead no evidence to substantiate their case and therefore fail to discharge the evidentiary burden on appeal. On that basis, the impugned order was not disturbed and the appeal was dismissed for want of evidence. The text emphasises that the absence of supporting proof is determinative when a party seeks to challenge an earlier decision in appellate proceedings, leaving no basis for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>