https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179075 A statutory election-dispute mechanism will generally exclude writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where the challenge to an election turns on disputed facts and the statute provides a complete election-petition remedy. The text also states that relief setting aside the election could not be granted without impleading the newly elected office-bearers, because they were directly affected and had already taken charge. In such matters, necessary parties must be joined or properly represented, failing which the writ petition is defective for non-joinder. en-us Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:06:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179075 A statutory election-dispute mechanism will generally exclude writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where the challenge to an election turns on disputed facts and the statute provides a complete election-petition remedy. The text also states that relief setting aside the election could not be granted without impleading the newly elected office-bearers, because they were directly affected and had already taken charge. In such matters, necessary parties must be joined or properly represented, failing which the writ petition is defective for non-joinder. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179075