<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 577 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271872</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the import registration process, finding it lacked merit. The categorization of importers into Category-A and Category-B was deemed rational and not arbitrary. The court accepted the rationale behind the provisional country cap for Turkey due to limited availability of poppy seeds. While the petition was dismissed, the court advised the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s suggestions for future trade regulation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 577 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271872</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the import registration process, finding it lacked merit. The categorization of importers into Category-A and Category-B was deemed rational and not arbitrary. The court accepted the rationale behind the provisional country cap for Turkey due to limited availability of poppy seeds. While the petition was dismissed, the court advised the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s suggestions for future trade regulation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>