https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271871 The High Court emphasized that interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India during ongoing proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority should be avoided unless there is a violation of prescribed procedures or a lack of jurisdiction. The Court noted that the order directing the petitioners to file replies was considered interim, and the appropriate remedy against the final order lay through appeal. The Court disposed of the petitions without costs, stating that the Adjudicating Authority's order was subject to appeal under the Customs Act, 1962. en-us Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 May 2016 16:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271871 The High Court emphasized that interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India during ongoing proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority should be avoided unless there is a violation of prescribed procedures or a lack of jurisdiction. The Court noted that the order directing the petitioners to file replies was considered interim, and the appropriate remedy against the final order lay through appeal. The Court disposed of the petitions without costs, stating that the Adjudicating Authority's order was subject to appeal under the Customs Act, 1962. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271871