<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CESTAT order Copy</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109904</link>
    <description>The tribunal considered entitlement to the benefit of Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. where the manufacturer did not avail Cenvat credit but paid under a clearance/composition mechanism; it treated the clearance payment as operative for applying the notification, addressing the interaction between non availment of Cenvat credit, clearance payment requirement, and notification benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:29:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CESTAT order Copy</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109904</link>
      <description>The tribunal considered entitlement to the benefit of Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. where the manufacturer did not avail Cenvat credit but paid under a clearance/composition mechanism; it treated the clearance payment as operative for applying the notification, addressing the interaction between non availment of Cenvat credit, clearance payment requirement, and notification benefit.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:29:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>