<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179063</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty of Rs. 80 lacs under Section 271AAA was unjustified. The assessee had disclosed the undisclosed income as business income, paid the taxes, and met the requirements under sub-section (2) of Section 271AAA. The tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty, overturning the decision of the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179063</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty of Rs. 80 lacs under Section 271AAA was unjustified. The assessee had disclosed the undisclosed income as business income, paid the taxes, and met the requirements under sub-section (2) of Section 271AAA. The tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty, overturning the decision of the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>