<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271868</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for the Assessment Year 2008-2009. The case centered on whether payments to ex-partners could be considered as diversion of income for deduction purposes. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on past rulings, rejected the Revenue&#039;s attempt to introduce a new tax evasion issue, and stressed the importance of accepting the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings. The appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing the need for the Revenue to abide by the Tribunal&#039;s findings unless proven otherwise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 06:32:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271868</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for the Assessment Year 2008-2009. The case centered on whether payments to ex-partners could be considered as diversion of income for deduction purposes. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on past rulings, rejected the Revenue&#039;s attempt to introduce a new tax evasion issue, and stressed the importance of accepting the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings. The appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing the need for the Revenue to abide by the Tribunal&#039;s findings unless proven otherwise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>