<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 572 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271867</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on various issues, including prior period expenses, accumulated provision for redelivery of aircraft on operating lease, directors&#039; personal expenses, aircraft taken on finance lease, and sale and leaseback of aircrafts. The Court found no substantial questions of law in these matters. The appeal was admitted on specific questions, and the case was directed to be heard along with another appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 06:32:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 572 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271867</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on various issues, including prior period expenses, accumulated provision for redelivery of aircraft on operating lease, directors&#039; personal expenses, aircraft taken on finance lease, and sale and leaseback of aircrafts. The Court found no substantial questions of law in these matters. The appeal was admitted on specific questions, and the case was directed to be heard along with another appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>