<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 567 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271862</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the interest expense claim, emphasizing the principle of consistency in tax assessments. It was held that without new incriminating material found during the search operations, completed assessments could not be reassessed. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, maintaining the integrity of the earlier assessments and reinforcing the requirement for new evidence to disturb concluded assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 567 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271862</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the interest expense claim, emphasizing the principle of consistency in tax assessments. It was held that without new incriminating material found during the search operations, completed assessments could not be reassessed. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, maintaining the integrity of the earlier assessments and reinforcing the requirement for new evidence to disturb concluded assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>