<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 558 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The decision was based on the precedent set in a similar case where the duty demand had been dropped. The Tribunal provided relief to the appellant in accordance with the law by deeming the penalty unsustainable and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 558 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The decision was based on the precedent set in a similar case where the duty demand had been dropped. The Tribunal provided relief to the appellant in accordance with the law by deeming the penalty unsustainable and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>