https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271852 The CESTAT allowed the appeal, remanding the case for a fresh decision, holding that the appellant was entitled to claim CENVAT Credit on travel agency services under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal relied on precedent judgments, including one from the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, establishing entitlement to input service credit for services related to the business of manufacturing final products. The appellant's claim was upheld, and consequential relief was granted. The judgment was pronounced on 19.1.2016. en-us Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Sep 2016 13:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271852 The CESTAT allowed the appeal, remanding the case for a fresh decision, holding that the appellant was entitled to claim CENVAT Credit on travel agency services under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal relied on precedent judgments, including one from the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, establishing entitlement to input service credit for services related to the business of manufacturing final products. The appellant's claim was upheld, and consequential relief was granted. The judgment was pronounced on 19.1.2016. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271852