https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271844 A charge memorandum served after an employee had been relieved on superannuation could not validly be treated as service on a government servant under Rule 14(4) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, because the employee had already ceased to hold that status. Departmental proceedings after retirement were also unsustainable absent the presidential sanction required by Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules for proceedings against a retired government servant. The charge memorandum was therefore invalidly served and the post-retirement disciplinary action could not be sustained without the requisite sanction. en-us Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 May 2016 16:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271844 A charge memorandum served after an employee had been relieved on superannuation could not validly be treated as service on a government servant under Rule 14(4) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, because the employee had already ceased to hold that status. Departmental proceedings after retirement were also unsustainable absent the presidential sanction required by Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules for proceedings against a retired government servant. The charge memorandum was therefore invalidly served and the post-retirement disciplinary action could not be sustained without the requisite sanction. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271844