<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 84 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2323</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case for fresh consideration due to bias, lack of evidence, and clarity issues in the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding a shortage of iron and steel scrap materials. The Commissioner (Appeals) criticized the Department for bias and lack of evidence, leading to the appeal being allowed. The lack of clarity on duty demand, penalty, and interest resulted in confusion, prompting a remand for de novo consideration to ensure a fair hearing and unbiased decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 84 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2323</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case for fresh consideration due to bias, lack of evidence, and clarity issues in the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding a shortage of iron and steel scrap materials. The Commissioner (Appeals) criticized the Department for bias and lack of evidence, leading to the appeal being allowed. The lack of clarity on duty demand, penalty, and interest resulted in confusion, prompting a remand for de novo consideration to ensure a fair hearing and unbiased decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>