<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Jewellery brand switches from &quot;Tanishq&quot; to &quot;Q&quot; and &quot;I&quot;; new names incur duty charges under trade name rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27390</link>
    <description>Demand of duty on Branded jewellery - appellant stopped using the brand name Tanishq and started using the mark Q and I and the jewellery were cleared and sold in the market, therefore the mark Q and I represents brand name or trade name - demand of duty confirmed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:27:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:27:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Jewellery brand switches from &quot;Tanishq&quot; to &quot;Q&quot; and &quot;I&quot;; new names incur duty charges under trade name rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27390</link>
      <description>Demand of duty on Branded jewellery - appellant stopped using the brand name Tanishq and started using the mark Q and I and the jewellery were cleared and sold in the market, therefore the mark Q and I represents brand name or trade name - demand of duty confirmed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:27:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>