<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 544 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271839</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition, directing the DT&amp;amp;T to examine the petitioners&#039; claims for the release of goods and communicate a decision within eight weeks. The court also directed the Crime Branch to pursue the investigation of the FIR to its logical conclusion. The court emphasized the need for regulatory measures to prevent such incidents in the future. No order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 544 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271839</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition, directing the DT&amp;amp;T to examine the petitioners&#039; claims for the release of goods and communicate a decision within eight weeks. The court also directed the Crime Branch to pursue the investigation of the FIR to its logical conclusion. The court emphasized the need for regulatory measures to prevent such incidents in the future. No order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>