<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 543 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271838</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of Trade Circular No. 2T of 2010, affirmed the applicability of Section 6A of the CST Act to interstate job work transactions, and supported the legality of the assessment and Tribunal&#039;s orders. Emphasizing the necessity of furnishing &#039;F&#039; forms for interstate transfers not by way of sale, the court directed the first appellate authority to decide the appeals by 30th May 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 543 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271838</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of Trade Circular No. 2T of 2010, affirmed the applicability of Section 6A of the CST Act to interstate job work transactions, and supported the legality of the assessment and Tribunal&#039;s orders. Emphasizing the necessity of furnishing &#039;F&#039; forms for interstate transfers not by way of sale, the court directed the first appellate authority to decide the appeals by 30th May 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>