<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1351 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179028</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the order of the adjudicating authority that rejected the prayer for cross-examination of witnesses. The Court directed the petitioner to file a show cause reply by a specified date, emphasizing cooperation with the adjudicatory process. The Court highlighted the importance of reasons in the adjudicating authority&#039;s order and the petitioner&#039;s right to appeal any adverse decision. The Court refrained from commenting on the merits at the present stage and allowed the petitioner to raise the issue of non-examination of witnesses in the statutory appeal. Ultimately, the Court disposed of the writ petition, providing reasons and directions for further legal recourse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1351 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179028</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the order of the adjudicating authority that rejected the prayer for cross-examination of witnesses. The Court directed the petitioner to file a show cause reply by a specified date, emphasizing cooperation with the adjudicatory process. The Court highlighted the importance of reasons in the adjudicating authority&#039;s order and the petitioner&#039;s right to appeal any adverse decision. The Court refrained from commenting on the merits at the present stage and allowed the petitioner to raise the issue of non-examination of witnesses in the statutory appeal. Ultimately, the Court disposed of the writ petition, providing reasons and directions for further legal recourse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>