https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271834 The Court allowed the writ petition, issuing a writ of mandamus stating that the respondents were not entitled to demand warehousing charges on the goods detained by the Customs authority until 11.04.2014. After this date, the petitioner would be liable to pay warehousing charges. The Court emphasized that the petitioner should have paid the charges under protest and contested the matter later to avoid further retention of the goods. en-us Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271834 The Court allowed the writ petition, issuing a writ of mandamus stating that the respondents were not entitled to demand warehousing charges on the goods detained by the Customs authority until 11.04.2014. After this date, the petitioner would be liable to pay warehousing charges. The Court emphasized that the petitioner should have paid the charges under protest and contested the matter later to avoid further retention of the goods. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271834