https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271829 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, concluding that the demand of Cenvat Credit, interest, and penalties could not be sustained due to insufficient corroborative evidence and the denial of cross-examination. The judgment emphasized the necessity of direct evidence and the right to cross-examine third-party witnesses in such cases, highlighting the importance of fair procedures in quasi-judicial proceedings. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:31:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271829 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, concluding that the demand of Cenvat Credit, interest, and penalties could not be sustained due to insufficient corroborative evidence and the denial of cross-examination. The judgment emphasized the necessity of direct evidence and the right to cross-examine third-party witnesses in such cases, highlighting the importance of fair procedures in quasi-judicial proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271829