https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271824 The court dismissed the petition, upholding the Government's decision not to issue a notification under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus was denied, as the court found the Government's discretion in not issuing the notification to be justifiable and not necessitating interference. The court emphasized the discretionary power of the Government under Section 11C and the policy considerations for issuing such notifications, which should benefit a larger section of the trade. The impact of a previous Supreme Court judgment was also noted, which influenced the outcome of the case. en-us Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271824 The court dismissed the petition, upholding the Government's decision not to issue a notification under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus was denied, as the court found the Government's discretion in not issuing the notification to be justifiable and not necessitating interference. The court emphasized the discretionary power of the Government under Section 11C and the policy considerations for issuing such notifications, which should benefit a larger section of the trade. The impact of a previous Supreme Court judgment was also noted, which influenced the outcome of the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271824