https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2314 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner's order that classified the training activity as "Consulting Engineer." The Tribunal determined that the training did not qualify as such services but rather fell under the category of "Commercial Training and Coaching Services." Citing precedents and legal interpretations, the Tribunal emphasized the incorrect application of the law by the Commissioner and granted the appeal with consequential relief. en-us Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2314 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner's order that classified the training activity as "Consulting Engineer." The Tribunal determined that the training did not qualify as such services but rather fell under the category of "Commercial Training and Coaching Services." Citing precedents and legal interpretations, the Tribunal emphasized the incorrect application of the law by the Commissioner and granted the appeal with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2314