<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 994 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179005</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance under section 14 A of the Income Tax Act due to lack of evidence of expenditure by the appellant in earning exempt income. The matter was remitted back to the AO for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity of evidence before disallowance. The challenge regarding capitalization of interest on fixed assets was not pursued by the appellant, leading to dismissal of related grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:08:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 994 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179005</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance under section 14 A of the Income Tax Act due to lack of evidence of expenditure by the appellant in earning exempt income. The matter was remitted back to the AO for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity of evidence before disallowance. The challenge regarding capitalization of interest on fixed assets was not pursued by the appellant, leading to dismissal of related grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>