<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 139 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2313</link>
    <description>Godown rent, establishment expenses, incentives, STD calls and similar items were considered for inclusion in the taxable value of clearing and forwarding agent service. The Tribunal followed a similar case and relied on the Trade Notice and Board clarification referred to in the order, holding that these amounts were not required to be added to the service value. The additions to taxable value were therefore unsustainable and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 139 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2313</link>
      <description>Godown rent, establishment expenses, incentives, STD calls and similar items were considered for inclusion in the taxable value of clearing and forwarding agent service. The Tribunal followed a similar case and relied on the Trade Notice and Board clarification referred to in the order, holding that these amounts were not required to be added to the service value. The additions to taxable value were therefore unsustainable and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>