<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 527 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271822</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the draft assessment order as the Assessing Officer lacked competency due to the petitioner&#039;s ineligibility as an &quot;eligible assessee.&quot; The court allowed parties to bear their own costs and left the assessment&#039;s potential time-barred status open for further legal action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 527 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271822</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the draft assessment order as the Assessing Officer lacked competency due to the petitioner&#039;s ineligibility as an &quot;eligible assessee.&quot; The court allowed parties to bear their own costs and left the assessment&#039;s potential time-barred status open for further legal action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>