https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2312 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the tax liability under "business auxiliary services" due to the absence of willful suppression to evade tax, making the demand time-barred. The classification of services under "Business Auxiliary Services" was upheld, rejecting the appellants' argument for classification under "Support Services of Business or Commerce." The Tribunal also dismissed the taxability of reimbursements, ultimately allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Mar 2014 12:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2312 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the tax liability under "business auxiliary services" due to the absence of willful suppression to evade tax, making the demand time-barred. The classification of services under "Business Auxiliary Services" was upheld, rejecting the appellants' argument for classification under "Support Services of Business or Commerce." The Tribunal also dismissed the taxability of reimbursements, ultimately allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2312