https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271810 The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's addition of unexplained deposits in the bank accounts as income from other sources instead of agricultural income. However, considering the assessees' ownership of a Mango Orchard and past acceptance of agricultural income from it, the Tribunal accepted the declared agricultural income. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to examine the nature of the excess deposits and permitted additions if the source of a portion remained unexplained. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:06:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271810 The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's addition of unexplained deposits in the bank accounts as income from other sources instead of agricultural income. However, considering the assessees' ownership of a Mango Orchard and past acceptance of agricultural income from it, the Tribunal accepted the declared agricultural income. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to examine the nature of the excess deposits and permitted additions if the source of a portion remained unexplained. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271810