<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 510 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271805</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider specific claims and verify the inclusion of interest income to prevent double taxation. The Tribunal upheld the reallocation of salary expenses but ruled in favor of the assessee on adjusting brought forward losses and depreciation before allowing exemption under section 10B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:05:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 510 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271805</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider specific claims and verify the inclusion of interest income to prevent double taxation. The Tribunal upheld the reallocation of salary expenses but ruled in favor of the assessee on adjusting brought forward losses and depreciation before allowing exemption under section 10B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>