<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 509 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify tax payments by recipients to determine if the assessee should be treated as &quot;assessee in default&quot; for short deduction of tax at source. The Tribunal upheld the levy of interest under section 201(1A) of the Act, stating that the assessee remains liable for interest until the deductees pay taxes on the income received, dismissing the appeal on this ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 509 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify tax payments by recipients to determine if the assessee should be treated as &quot;assessee in default&quot; for short deduction of tax at source. The Tribunal upheld the levy of interest under section 201(1A) of the Act, stating that the assessee remains liable for interest until the deductees pay taxes on the income received, dismissing the appeal on this ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>