<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 506 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The Tribunal found that the assessee had valid reasons for the delay in filing the wealth tax return, attributing it to ongoing litigations and other departmental actions. Emphasizing natural justice, the Tribunal concluded that the circumstances warranted deleting the penalty, highlighting the substantial compliance by the assessee upon receiving the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:04:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 506 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The Tribunal found that the assessee had valid reasons for the delay in filing the wealth tax return, attributing it to ongoing litigations and other departmental actions. Emphasizing natural justice, the Tribunal concluded that the circumstances warranted deleting the penalty, highlighting the substantial compliance by the assessee upon receiving the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>