<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Share Transfer Not a &#039;Reorganisation&#039;; Focus Was Exit Strategy for Non-Resident Shareholders.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27365</link>
    <description>Capital gain arising on transfer of shares - the attempt of the assessee to bring the transferring of shares within the ambit of the term “reorganisation” may not be correct, since the object of the arrangement was not financial restructuring, but to provide an exit route to the non-resident shareholders. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:21:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Share Transfer Not a &#039;Reorganisation&#039;; Focus Was Exit Strategy for Non-Resident Shareholders.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27365</link>
      <description>Capital gain arising on transfer of shares - the attempt of the assessee to bring the transferring of shares within the ambit of the term “reorganisation” may not be correct, since the object of the arrangement was not financial restructuring, but to provide an exit route to the non-resident shareholders. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:21:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>