https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178976 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI found the appellants guilty of misleading the Tribunal by seeking adjournment on false grounds, constituting contempt of court. The Tribunal referred the case to the High Court for contempt proceedings, emphasizing the seriousness of seeking adjournment through deceptive means. The appellants were given an opportunity to explain within 15 days before any decision on the reference to the High Court. The advocate representing the appellants was discharged, and the appellants were directed to appear before the Tribunal to address the contemptuous behavior, ensuring due process was followed. en-us Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:19:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178976 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI found the appellants guilty of misleading the Tribunal by seeking adjournment on false grounds, constituting contempt of court. The Tribunal referred the case to the High Court for contempt proceedings, emphasizing the seriousness of seeking adjournment through deceptive means. The appellants were given an opportunity to explain within 15 days before any decision on the reference to the High Court. The advocate representing the appellants was discharged, and the appellants were directed to appear before the Tribunal to address the contemptuous behavior, ensuring due process was followed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178976