<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 59 -  CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant to M/s. Gulbarga Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. did not amount to &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal remanded the case for re-computation of Service Tax liability, excluding charges for hiring hardware and Information Technology Services. The appellants were directed to be considered for cum-duty benefit as they had not collected Service Tax from their customer. The decision clarified the distinction between &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039; and &#039;Information Technology Services&#039; and provided specific directions for re-computation of tax liability, emphasizing compliance with Service Tax obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 59 -  CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant to M/s. Gulbarga Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. did not amount to &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal remanded the case for re-computation of Service Tax liability, excluding charges for hiring hardware and Information Technology Services. The appellants were directed to be considered for cum-duty benefit as they had not collected Service Tax from their customer. The decision clarified the distinction between &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039; and &#039;Information Technology Services&#039; and provided specific directions for re-computation of tax liability, emphasizing compliance with Service Tax obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>